1
News & Political Discussion / Re: Team Biden/Harris
« Last post by B.B. on Yesterday at 12:39:27 PM »They get it right far more often than not, and there are many layers of appeal, pre- and post-conviction.
^ This was not your original contention, and you are moving the goalposts.
IP wasn't a very good example to substantiate your point. Do you have others?
To the contrary, it was a very good rebuttal to your original contention about the infallibility of juries.
I rely on the reports of folks who investigated and not on emotions.
CNN clears self; "We had nothing to do with it."
You: "Hurr, durr, okay."
Riiiiiiight. It was just a coincidence....
How turfed? Hunter Biden was charged for acts discovered on the laptop.
The left-wing media BLARED about how it was "fake" and Big Tech turfed it before the election to help Biden.
Washington Post joins New York Times in finally admitting emails from Hunter Biden laptop are real[/quote]
Bruce Golding
Published March 30, 2022
So a year and a half after the election, when it would have been material to whether Swamp Thing Joe Biden was on the take or not, WaPo FINALLY had the decency to admit the truth...and don't think that timing was an accident - well after the 2020 election, well before the 2024 election.
I can't find anywhere that impeachment requires some burden of proof standard for conviction.
LOFL! Just a minute ago you were screeching "No direct proof! No direct proof!" now it's "There's no standard of proof! There's no standard of proof!"
Which is it, Timmy?
Whatabout...
Whatabout...
Whatabout...
That's why...
I used Gore as an illustration of why the court would/would not intervene. But I get it, you struggle with abstract thinking. I will try to dumb things down for you.
Which is exactly why Trump is trying so hard to get into that orange suit
Trump is campaigning against the process. Simples.
and enjoy the bondage accessories.
Ok, now you're getting weird.
Where are all his supporters protesting for him outside the courthouse?
There were, in fact both Trump supporters and anti-Trump protesters outside the courthouse.
I could say more, but I will just wait for you to move the goalposts again.
Heck, even his wife and kids aren't there to support him in the courtroom... IMO this says more than anything else we can toss around here.
In your opinion. OTOH:
Donald Trump's Family Skipping Court 'Right' Decision, Legal Analyst Says
"I think Trump is making the right decision to have no family in court. I think juries can see through the manipulative tactic of bringing family members to court as props to elicit their sympathy," {Former U.S. attorney and University of Michigan law professor Barbara } McQuade said. "A person who really loves their family would not subject them to the pain of listening to ugly accusations and evidence against him."
B/B