HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Sure. You might want to familiarize yourself with the work of the Innocence Project.
Most IP exonerations were due to eyewitness misidentification and cleared with DNA evidence. I don't believe identifying Trump will be a problem in any of these cases.
I did not criticize the lack of subpoena, I criticized the method by which it was handled, which, especially for a former president, was highly bullshit.
They are turning this into a circus, for example, the pre-dawn raid on the home Roger Stone - at which a CNN crew, completely coincidentally and without any prior coordination just HAPPENED to be present for - a man then in his mid 60s with no history of violence. Typical protocol would have to arrange, via his attorney, for Stone to turn himself in, but doing that doesn't make for good TV and doesn't taint the jury pool.
CNN explained "just HAPPENED"
https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/25/politics/roger-stone-raid/index.htmlYou recall incorrectly. The entire RussiaGate thing was a hoax, the Laptop was real, etc. etc. Nobody has "debunked" Tony Boubalinski either. Biden is being protected because he is a DC insider. The Mueller Report was based on fraudulent evidence that the FBI KNEW was fraudulent at the time of the report - they knew that the Steele Dossier was bullshit within 36 hours of it being turned over to them (this was part of the Sussman investigation).
Sure, some information in the Steele dossier was junk, and some were corroborated. Yes, the laptop was real and GOP in congress has the power to investigate, subpoena and impeach if any evidence of a crime committed by Joe Biden results. But alas, he is still in office and the congressional impeachment proceedings have lost steam. Why?
https://youtube.com/shorts/32fzOzCM5EwThis is a non-sequitur. And H-rod was (a) never president, and (b) the intelligence apparatus was never deployed against her.
Again, the GOP-controlled House has every investigative tool and power available to call just about anyone they want to testify under oath. Does this not include folks within the intelligence apparatus? Never deployed? I'm pretty sure they were heavily involved with her email server.
Typically judges will say it's a non-justiciable political question and they give a lot of deference to the executive branches (of the states). Ask Al Gore, who somehow managed to get the SCOFL to give him a recount in ONLY 3 heavily D counties. The joke was on him, though; he netted 3 whole votes in the Miami Dade recount. For some reason he still goes around saying he won, but hasn't gone to prison over it yet. /shrugs
Indeed, he conceded twice
His case went to SCOTUS, and that was it. End of the road. If he is still of the opinion that he should have won so what?
I doubt he will be jailed for contempt, and if so, it will be for a few hours/days.
B/B
I dunno... he sure is pushing hard for that orange suit. He loves digging holes and then blames others when he falls in.
Forum
Help
Search
Calendar
Chat
Login
Register
Recent Posts
