The Kremlin Denies Sending Russian Mercenaries to Venezuela

[Wiz]

Hands Off Venezuela - UPDATE
Foreign Minister Arreaza Holds UN Marathon for Peace:
Usurper Guaido Urges Military Intervention and War

In a herculean effort to prevent war, and protect the integrity of his country, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza held a breathtaking schedule of events at the United Nations, including a meeting with the Secretary-General, consultations with the envoys of 60 member states supporting Venezuela’s sovereignty,  a press conference the evening of February 22, speaking at a Security Council meeting February 26,  and presenting an address at the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva on February 27.

Arreaza’s encyclopedic knowledge of history is one of his powerful assets,  as he patiently clarified to reporters, at last Friday’s press conference, the reality of US instigated economic warfare underlying Venezuela’s current crisis.  At one bizarre moment, a European reporter, asked, Mussolini-style, about a report that Venezuelan armed forces shot an unarmed indigenous person, and compared the incident to “what happened in China.”  Arreaza asked whether the reporter had seen the incident, and, evading Arreaza’s question the reporter continued:  “Is your government giving specific orders to shoot unarmed people, and what will happen to those who refuse to comply with these orders?”  The stupefying question, less a query, and more unsubstantiated innuendo, was asked with such arrogance and grandiosity that Arriaza, fully aware of the insinuation intended, replied:

“Your question is full of venom and very poisonous.  The army of Bolivar has never had orders to fire on the civilian population, and you should be the first to assess the reliability of false ‘reports,’ and false flag operations. It is your responsibility as a reporter to be smart, astute, and delve into the truth, and recognize propaganda.”

What was unmistakable, throughout last week, and again at Tuesday’s Security Council meeting, is Arreaza’s passionate effort to prevent the bloodbath of military confrontation,  reiterating the historic context of the Venezuelan crisis to reporters and diplomats who may have a stunted recognition of  the barbarous – but often ingenious – methods used by Washington to impose domination and de facto slavery on nations in Latin America.  Theirs is virtually a scientific formula – economic destabilization, a relentless media disinformation campaign, and if the current target – in this case Venezuela – does not submit to domination, ultimately military force will be decisive in inflicting regime change, installing a docile, subservient puppet.  The horrific example of the overthrow of Allende in Chile is merely one example.

In view of the usual perception of indigenous people as vulnerable and marginalized, it was therefore extremely interesting to see a New York Times report, February 23, confirming that “Indigenous leaders seized General Jose Miguel Montoya Ramirez, the head of Bolivar state’s National Guard force, and some of his subordinates, two opposition lawmakers from the area said in interviews….the lawmakers said it was unclear how long the indigenous leaders intended to hold the captives.”  It is obvious that it would not be possible for “vulnerable” people to seize a Venezuelan General and the head of Bolivar state’s National Guard unless the “vulnerable” people were powerfully armed.  And where the indigenous people got the arms from is an even more interesting question.  It is not a minor accomplishment to kidnap the General of a National Guard force.

The Wall Street Journal on February 25, 2019 headlined:  “Maduro’s Opposition Urges Military Force in Venezuela,” making inescapable that the Venezuelan opposition is either lobotomized, or heedless of the bloodbath military action will culminate in.  The New York Times on February 25, page 4, has a large photograph of “innocent, unarmed” protesters preparing Molotov cocktails on Sunday along the Venezuela-Colombia border.

The Security Council meeting Tuesday, February 26, was preceded by an asinine lineup of eight members of the European Union, demanding that Venezuela immediately call elections.  Evidently ignorant of the fact that former U.S. President Jimmy Carter characterized the Venezuelan electoral process as “one of the best in the world,” and the US electoral process as “one of the worst,”  these European proxies were better suited to comic parody in a Mozart opera than to intervention in matters of war and peace.  And, of course, who is to determine that, even if new elections are called, they will be either free or fair.  Obviously, the result will be as Washington directs its European colonies to approve.

It would not be possible to avoid reference to U.S. Senator Marco Rubio’s gruesome tweet, threatening Maduro, and not incidentally Kim Jong Un, with hideous death by torture, including sodomization with bayonets before his murder.  These horrific actions were committed by those “vulnerable, peaceful Libyans” for whom the UN Security Council, enacting Resolution 1973 and “Responsibity to Protect,” in the unforgettable words of Indian Ambassador Puri, were authorized to “bomb the hell out of Libya.”  It is very likely that the Venezuelan opposition, especially those thugs,  photographed by The New York Times on February 23 preparing Molotov cocktails, are the same breed as those Libyan monsters who, among other tortures, sodomized President Khadaffi with a bayonet before murdering him.  No doubt Kim Jong Un will duly note this threat, and perhaps Maduro will ponder Khadaffi’s mistake in surrendering his nuclear program.

Today’s Security Council meeting, with the failure of both the US and Russian drafts, included Elliott Abrams regurgitating the same dangerous and deadly platitudes as always.  The double veto of the US draft, by both China and Russia, saved the Security Council from endorsing another catastrophic military intervention.

Posted by Carla Stea on March 01, 2019  who is Global Research, correspondent at United Nations Headquarters, New York, N.Y.

[Contrarian]

Venezuelan soldiers are leaving the military in droves.

Juan Guaido, the Venezuelan opposition leader who has been recognized as interim president by dozens of countries, said Friday that 600 military personnel had defected in the week since Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro ordered them to block the entry of aid sent by the US as part of an effort to oust him.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.businessinsider.com/venezuelan-soldiers-reasons-explain-why-they-desert-and-turn-on-nicolas-maduro-2019-3

But that doesn’t include high ranking officers, who have a vested interest in staying.

Many senior military leaders have personal and financial interests at stake - protecting special privileges, like higher pay, and avoiding prosecution for involvement in illegal activity, like drug smuggling. Junior officers and rank-and-file troops, however, have no such interests.

[Contrarian]

Venezuela was once the wealthiest country in South America.


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/03/01/venezuela-juan-guaido-nicolas-maduro-south-america.html

[2tallbill]

That USA puppet, Guaido, made his declaration less than a month ago after
his USA Masters told him to do it and the very next day the same masters together
with the other Vassal states come out recognising him as the President.

Let's remember that our puppet won an election to their National Assembly and
then was elected by the members of that National Assembly to be the president
of the National Assembly.

So he is a semi legitimate puppet and one leg of their elected government. If the
president is determined unable to serve the President of the National Assembly
steps in until a new election can be made see section 233 of the Venezuelan
constitution in the link below.   

The puppet is calling for new elections and I don't know if he can do that with a
sitting president who is able to serve. I've read the US constitution many times
but I have read the Venezuelan constitution zero times.

Here is a link to the Venezuelan constitution in English. https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Venezuela_2009.pdf

[Wiz]

Bill

Thank you very much for the Constitution and your comments. I had a brief reading of the basics but I have to admit that my opinion is still the same.

Venezuela is a sovereign and independent country. Whatever is going on there it's none of our business, neither of our respective Governments or anybody else for that matter.

May I remind that the ex U.S. President Jimmy Carter characterized the Venezuelan electoral process as “one of the best in the world,” and the US electoral process as “one of the worst” I am sure you will agree that Carter and his organisation overseen elections around the world must know better than you and me.

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
of the
VENEZUELAN CONSTITUTION

Article 1

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is irrevocably free and independent, basing its
moral property and values of freedom, equality, justice and international peace on
the doctrine of Simon Bolivar, the Liberator.

Independence, liberty, sovereignty, immunity, territorial integrity and national
self-determination are non renounceable rights of the Nation.

Article 2

Venezuela constitutes itself as a Democratic and Social State of Law and Justice,
which holds as superior values of its legal order and actions those of life, liberty,
justice, equality, solidarity, democracy, social responsibility and, in general, the
preeminence of human rights, ethics and political pluralism.

Article 3

The essential purposes of the State are the protection and development of the
individual and respect for the dignity of the individual, the democratic exercise of the
will of the people, the building of a just and peace loving society, the furtherance of
the prosperity and welfare of the people and the guaranteeing of the Fulfillment of
the principles, rights and duties established in this Constitution.

Education and work are the fundamental processes for guaranteeing these purposes.

Article 4

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is a decentralized Federal State on the terms
set forth in this Constitution, governed by the principles of territorial integrity,
cooperation, solidarity, attendance and shared responsibility.

_______________________________________

That is enough for us, any other action from your Government and what the Zionist Neocon Organiser Elliot Abraams says it's simply crap.

I expect you may seen and if not you may find this video interesting to watch.

The same applies for CONFED  too, who does not pay attention to what I write or post. All he has posted  are well known facts. This world is not full of ignorant people and idiots.

Watch the video....... and wake up!

Confessions of an Economic Hitman

There are two ways to conquer and enslave a Nation

One is by sword and The Other is by Debt.

 

[Contrarian]

1, 3 and 4 are hilarious!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.urbandictionary.com/define.php%3fterm=wiz&amp=true

[Wiz]

1, 3 and 4 are hilarious!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.urbandictionary.com/define.php%3fterm=wiz&amp=true

But Number 6 is the best and more accurate!

wiz
wiz means that you are just amazing at everything you do but usually your best at sex and in the bed

he is wiz...

you know his sex is good
#sexy#sex#amazing#gee#fun

 

 

[Wiz]

One more educational video to keep you busy...... and learning!

An Ocean of Lies on Venezuela

 

[2tallbill]

Bill

Thank you very much for the Constitution and your comments. I had a brief reading of the basics but I have to admit that my opinion is still the same.

Venezuela is a sovereign and independent country. Whatever is going on there it's none of our business, neither of our respective Governments or anybody else for that matter.

May I remind that the ex U.S. President Jimmy Carter characterized the Venezuelan electoral process as “one of the best in the world,” and the US electoral process as “one of the worst” I am sure you will agree that Carter and his organisation overseen elections around the world must know better than you and me.

FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
of the
VENEZUELAN CONSTITUTION

Article 1

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is irrevocably free and independent, basing its
moral property and values of freedom, equality, justice and international peace on
the doctrine of Simon Bolivar, the Liberator.

Independence, liberty, sovereignty, immunity, territorial integrity and national
self-determination are non renounceable rights of the Nation.

Article 2

Venezuela constitutes itself as a Democratic and Social State of Law and Justice,
which holds as superior values of its legal order and actions those of life, liberty,
justice, equality, solidarity, democracy, social responsibility and, in general, the
preeminence of human rights, ethics and political pluralism.

Article 3

The essential purposes of the State are the protection and development of the
individual and respect for the dignity of the individual, the democratic exercise of the
will of the people, the building of a just and peace loving society, the furtherance of
the prosperity and welfare of the people and the guaranteeing of the Fulfillment of
the principles, rights and duties established in this Constitution.

Education and work are the fundamental processes for guaranteeing these purposes.

Article 4

The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is a decentralized Federal State on the terms
set forth in this Constitution, governed by the principles of territorial integrity,
cooperation, solidarity, attendance and shared responsibility.

_______________________________________

That is enough for us, any other action from your Government and what the Zionist Neocon Organiser Elliot Abraams says it's simply crap.

I expect you may seen and if not you may find this video interesting to watch.

The same applies for CONFED  too, who does not pay attention to what I write or post. All he has posted  are well known facts. This world is not full of ignorant people and idiots.

Watch the video....... and wake up!

Confessions of an Economic Hitman

There are two ways to conquer and enslave a Nation

One is by sword and The Other is by Debt.

 

I don't think that the USA should interfere in Venezuela especially militarily, on that
I think we agree. Venezuela got themselves into this mess and they need to get themselves
out of it.

Jimmy Carter has monitored 107 elections in 39 countries since 1989 and he has not
declared a single one of them suspect or dishonest. He has certified the election of
every tin pot dictator that has crossed his path.

[Wiz]

I don't think that the USA should interfere in Venezuela especially militarily, on that
I think we agree. Venezuela got themselves into this mess and they need to get themselves out of it.

Jimmy Carter has monitored 107 elections in 39 countries since 1989 and he has not
declared a single one of them suspect or dishonest. He has certified the election of
every tin pot dictator that has crossed his path.

I understand, it is very difficult for an American to accept guild or criticise the actions of his country’s Governments, over the years, but the last 2 videos prove conclusively that USA is the real culprit who brought Venezuela to the current state.

Ask your self, why these war mongers you have in your Government…..Tramp, Pompeo, Bolt etc openly threaten and planning an invasion of Venezuela?

The answer is simple. They want to control the large oil and other natural resources of the country.

Ask yourself these questions?

1. Why the USA had to invade and destroy so many countries after the WWII and also Why the USA has the need to have so many Bases around the world?

A: Because your economy is based on the huge defence industry, created during the WWII and expanded later more to control most world countries.

2. How many countries in the world have nuclear weapons 2018?

A: 9 countries but Israhel it’s not part of the Nuke club neither reports to anybody!

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/16/list-of-countries-with-nuclear-weapons.html

3. Tell us one country that the USA has invaded that had Nuclear Arsenal?

A: NONE and there are plenty around!

4. Why the USA has to support financially Israhel every year? 

A: In 2012, demographers estimated the core American Jewish population (including religious and non-religious) to be 5,425,000 (or 1.73% of the Total US population of 325.7 million (2017).

http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/us-population

it is pretty obvious that the US Administrations over the years were controlled or dominated by the small 1.73% of the population, which of course controls your FED and banking system and the Mass Media, as I have already posted through 6 Huge Corporations.

Today who do you think has established and Control the NWO?


PS: I suggest you start reading and watching alternative Media.... and avoid the Corporative controlled  Mass Media....

Start from these : https://www.globalresearch.ca/

and subscribe to channels like this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1glTX3c8ttY

[msmoby]

 Tell us one country that the USA has invaded that had Nuclear Arsenal?

A: NONE and there are plenty around!

Too busy to answer all your daft questions - but this for starters ...

Were the US recalcitrant about taking out terrorists in Pakistan ?

Would the Kremlin have been so active in Ukraine - if they hadn't given up THEIR nukes in return for the 'protection' of the 'Budapest Memorandum'


As ever, Wiz ... your 'examples' demonstrate the US is not alone in 'away games' in weaker opponents

[andrewfi]

If the United States had anything other than self-interest as motivation then they would not be interfering, illegally, in Venezuela. There is no legal justification for any of the actions being undertaken by the U.S government in the country.

[Wiz]

Trump Regime Electricity War in Venezuela
More Serious than First Believed

On Thursday, Venezuela’s Guri dam hydroelectric power plant was cyberattacked at 5:00 PM during the late afternoon rush hour to cause maximum disruption.

Up to 80% of the country was affected, damage done more severe than initially thought. Weeks or months of planning likely preceded what happened – US behind it? considerable expertise needed to pull it off.[/size]

On Friday, another cyberattack occurred, followed by a third one on Saturday, affecting parts of the country where power was restored, further complicating resolution of the problem, Maduro saying:

After power was restored to about 70% of the country, “we received another attack, of a cybernetic nature, at midday…that disturbed the reconnection process and knocked out everything that had been achieved until noon,” adding:

“(O)ne of the sources of generation that was working perfectly” was sabotaged again…infiltrators…attacking the electric company from the inside.”

Power is being restored “manually,” efforts continuing to learn precisely why computerized systems failed – things further complicated after a Bolivar state substation transformer exploded and burned, suggesting more sabotage.

What’s happening in Venezuela is similar to infecting Iran’s Bushehr and Natanz nuclear power facilities with a Stuxnet malware computer virus in 2010, a likely joint US/Israeli intelligence operation. Edward Snowden blamed them for what happened.

At the time, operations were halted indefinitely. Iran called the incident a hostile act. General Gholam-Reza Jalali said if the affected facilities went online infected, Iran’s entire electrical power grid could have been shut down.

It took months to fully resolve the problem. Following the summer 2010 attack, the malware continued to infect the facilities’ centrifuges, requiring their replacement.

An Institute for Science and International Security analysis said:

“(a)ssuming Iran exercises caution, Stuxnet is unlikely to destroy more centrifuges at the (affected plants).”

“Iran likely cleaned the malware from its control systems. To prevent re-infection, Iran will have to exercise special caution since so many computers in Iran contain Stuxnet,” adding:

“Although Stuxnet appears to be designed to destroy centrifuges at (Iranian nuclear facilities), destruction was by no means total.”

“Stuxnet did not lower the production of low-enriched uranium (LEU) during 2010. LEU quantities could have certainly been greater, and Stuxnet could be an important part of the reason why they did not increase significantly.”

“(T)here remain important questions about why Stuxnet destroyed only 1,000 centrifuges. One observation is that it may be harder to destroy centrifuges by use of cyber attacks than often believed.”

Head of Bushehr’s nuclear power plant said only personal computers of staff were infected by the Stuxnet virus. Then-Iranian Telecommunications Minister Reza Taghipour said government systems experienced no serious damage.

Iran’s Information Technology Council director Mahmud Liaii said

“(a)n electronic war has been launched against Iran… This computer worm is designed to transfer data about production lines from our industrial plants to locations outside Iran.”

Deputy head of Iran’s government Information Technology Company Hamid Alipour said

“(t)he attack is still ongoing and new versions of this virus are spreading,” adding:

“We had anticipated that we could root out the virus within one to two months, but the virus is not stable, and since we started the cleanup process three new versions of it have been spreading.”

If malware similar to Stuxnet was used against Venezuela’s power grid, the problem could linger for months, parts of the country continued to be affected by outages for some time.

Maduro’s government will need to marshal considerable technical expertise to fully resolve things – the type cybersecurity/anti-virus/security software skills Russia-based multinational firm Kaspersky Lab can provide.

It can also identify the attack’s source and lay blame where it belongs – the US most likely responsible. It clearly has motive, opportunity and expertise – waging war on Venezuela by other means to topple its government and gain another imperial trophy.

If the malware infection is widespread, continued outages may happen until the problem is fully resolved.

Resolution may take months, disruption in the country persisting, clearly the motive behind the attack.

Posted by Stephen Lendman, at Global Research on 11 March 2019

[Wiz]

 Tell us one country that the USA has invaded that had Nuclear Arsenal?

A: NONE and there are plenty around!

Too busy to answer all your daft questions - but this for starters ...

Were the US recalcitrant about taking out terrorists in Pakistan ?

Would the Kremlin have been so active in Ukraine - if they hadn't given up THEIR nukes in return for the 'protection' of the 'Budapest Memorandum'


As ever, Wiz ... your 'examples' demonstrate the US is not alone in 'away games' in weaker opponents

Sorry Mastermind!     ..... but I have more pleasurable things to do in my life then entertaining you!

If you post a Travel report, as you said including photos from the section at E60, with the Russian incursion, I pointed to you.... I may reply!

Any plans to visit Armenia?

Visiting "Batuni" ..... obviously very important for fast EXit or supplying route.... to your new assignment and plans of your handlers.

 

[andrewfi]

If the events are related to electronic attack then it kinda reduces the field of likely, motivated, attackers.

These things are not coincidences. Venezuela is clearly under attack, an undeclared war.

[Wiz]

It is very clear that they will pursuit Maduro and strangle or kill him, like they did to Muammar Al Gaddafi in Libya. Just wonder who helped himself to the Gold Gaddafi had accumulated and we didn't heard enough about the killing of that US Ambassador?

Here something interesting from one of their Horses Mouth!

Corporate Media “Presstitutes” Turn Blind Eye
to UN Report on Venezuela

Washington and the Convict Appointed to
Overthrow Venezuela Continue the Lies

By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts Global Research, March 09, 2019

Don’t you think something is fishy when the presstitutes orchestrate a fake news “humanitarian crisis” in Venezuela, but totally ignore the real humanitarian crises in Yemen and Gaza?

Don’t you think something is really very rotten when the expert, Alfred Maurice de Zayas,  sent by the UN to Venezuela to evaluate the situation finds no interest by any Western media or any Western government in his report?

Don’t you think it is a bit much for Washington to steal $21 billion of Venezuela’s money, impose sanctions in an effort to destabilize the country and to drive the Venezuelan government to its knees, blame Venezuelan socialism (essentially nationalization of the oil company) for bringing “starvation to the people,” and offer a measly $21 million in “humanitarian aid.”

As the United States is completely devoid of any print or TV media, it falls upon internet media such as this website to perform the missing function of honest journalism. 

As for the alleged starvation and humanitarian crisis in Venezuela, Zayas has this to say:

The December 2017 and March 2018 reports of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) list food crises in 37 countries. “The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is not among them.”

“In 2017, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela requested medical aid from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the plea was rejected, because Venezuela ‘is still a high-income country … and as such is not eligible’.”

The “crisis” in Venezuela “cannot be compared with the humanitarian crises in Gaza, Yemen, Libya, the Syrian Arab Republic, Iraq, Haiti, Mali, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Somalia, or Myanmar, among others.”

In order to discredit selected governments, failures in the field of human rights are maximized so as to make violent overthrow more palatable. Human rights are being “weaponized” against rivals.

In paragraph 37 of his report, de Zayas says:

  “Modern-day economic sanctions and blockades are comparable with medieval sieges of towns with the intention of forcing them to surrender. Twenty-first century sanctions attempt to bring not just a town, but sovereign countries to their knees. A difference, perhaps, is that twenty-first century sanctions are accompanied by the manipulation of public opinion through ‘fake news’, aggressive public relations and a pseudo-human rights rhetoric so as to give the impression that a human rights ‘end’ justifies the criminal means. There is not only a horizontal juridical world order governed by the Charter of the United Nations and principles of sovereign equality, but also a vertical world order reflecting the hierarchy of a geopolitical system that links dominant States with the rest of the world according to military and economic power. It is the latter, geopolitical system that generates geopolitical crimes, hitherto in total impunity.”

He expresses concern about the level of polarization and disinformation that surrounds every narrative about Venezuela.

“A disquieting media campaign seeks to force observers into a preconceived view that there is a ‘humanitarian crisis’ in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. An independent expert must be wary of hyperbole, bearing in mind that ‘humanitarian crisis’ is a term of art (terminus technicus) that can be misused as a pretext for military intervention.”

In order to discredit selected governments, failures in the field of human rights are maximized so as to make violent overthrow more palatable. Human rights are being ‘weaponized’ against rivals.

A political solution is blocked because “certain countries [the US] do not want to see a peaceful solution to the Venezuelan conflict and prefer to prolong the suffering of the people of that country, with the expectation that the situation will reach the threshold of a humanitarian crisis and provoke a military intervention to impose a regime change.”

Washington’s attack on Venezuela is in violation of established international law.

“The principles of non-intervention and non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign States belong to customary international law and have been reaffirmed in General Assembly resolutions, notably 2625 (XXV) and 3314 (XXIX), and in the 1993 Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action. Article 32 of the Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, adopted by the General Assembly in 1974, stipulates that no State may use or encourage the use of economic, political or any other type of measures to coerce another State in order to obtain from it the subordination of the exercise of its sovereign rights.”  Chapter 4, article 19, of the Charter of the OAS stipulates that “No State or group of States has the right to intervene, directly or indirectly, for any reason whatever, in the internal or external affairs of any other State. The foregoing principle prohibits not only armed force but also any other form of interference or attempted threat against the personality of the State or against its political, economic, and cultural elements.”

Zayas reports that an atmosphere of intimidation accompanied the mission, attempting to pressure him into a predetermined matrix. He received letters from American-financed NGOs asking him not to proceed on his own, dictating to him the report he should write. Prior to his arrival in Venezuela, a propaganda campaign was launched against him on Facebook and Twitter questioning his integrity and accusing  him of bias. (See this)

As Washington’s sanctions and currency manipulations constitute geopolitical crimes, Zayas asks what reparations are due to the victims of sanctions.  He recommends that the International Criminal Court investigate Washington’s coercive measures that can cause death from malnutrition and lack of medicines and medical equipment.

“Despite being the first UN official to visit and report from Venezuela in 21 years, Mr de Zayas said his research into the causes of the country’s economic crisis has so far largely been ignored by the UN and the media, and caused little debate within the Human Rights Council.

“He believes his report has been ignored because it goes against the popular narrative that Venezuela needs regime change.” (See this)

Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world and an abundance of other natural resources including gold, bauxite and coltan. But under the Maduro government they’re not accessible to US and transnational corporations.

Hasta Siempre Victoria

[msmoby]

Wiz...

Who are 'they!?

Saddam was tried and executed by fellow Iraquis and Gaddafi's demise was at the hand of a bunch of locals on the spur of the moment.

'They!...as in France and America...stopped Gaddafi's tank steam rollering into Benghazi..


Shame Britain would not zupport Cameron to end the use of Barrel bombs in Syria with a no fly zone...

You man is finished... the shame is other nations still supporting his failed policy.