President Trump

[?ManyQuestions?]

BTW I’m looking forward to the next Civil War in the USA, especially with guys like this on our side.


https://bearingarms.com/tom-k/2018/08/16/texas-man-claims-record-breaking-3-mile-shot/

I don't understand why you'd be looking forward to such a terrible event; however, I would not be very surprised if something like that took place. The U.S. seems to be fracturing in a rather frightening manner.

There’s a fever pitch of lunacy on the left and it’s gonna get worse before it gets better.

Lefty’s think it’s okay to block traffic on freeways, pepper spray lawful assemblies and speech by Trump supporters, commit millions of dollars of property damage etc not only because they lost the election but also because they’ve been brainwashed to believe that Socialism/Communism will work.

Conservatives are prepared so if it happens let’s get it over ASAP.  Now I suspect after a couple hundred or a thousand of these progs find out the hard way what a real fight is they’ll wave that white flag of surrender.

The real perps of 9/11 also need to be put on trial and executed like the Rosenbergs were back when they sold nuclear secrets.

That’s a separate issue from 3 main problems with the left: the media is mostly left-wing and continues to lie to the public, for example claiming Trump supporters to be violent when in fact the violence comes from the left. The media protects the violent Antifa group by downplaying their real nature. College campuses are left-wing and professors are Marxist. Courts in California and other Lib cities dominated by lefty’s.

Here a “professor” assaults a Trump supporter with a bike lock and runs away. 4Chan tracks him down, he is arrested and faces 11 years in prison. A liberal judge let him off. Total double standard!

Left-wing extremist only gets probation, media not outraged.


https://www.berkeleyside.com/2018/08/08/eric-clanton-takes-3-year-probation-deal-in-berkeley-rally-bike-lock-assault-case

Of course the media protects Antifa. George Soros has to protect his Marxist friends that he also pays. One hand washes the other.

https://capitalresearch.org/article/origins-of-antifa/

Also, I know this is a cube classic. But maybe we should send in a Taliban peacekeeping force to pacify Antifa!  

http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/taliban-send-peace-keeping-advisers-to-chicago-t10671.html

"After the first dozen or so public executions at (insert US city here), even the stupidest Antifa man will understand we mean business. Then we start getting some real change."

[shakespear]

While I'm not prepared to fully discount the accusation of Christine Blasey Ford, there is much of it that has the smell of "unrefrigerated fish". The timing is suspicious. Senator Feinstein knew about this accusation in July. Why did she only reveal it this week? Further, her story seems to be full of memory lapses and inconsistencies.

1) The brother of Christine Blazey Ford worked for Fusion GPS. Wow, what a coincidence.

2) Martha G. Kavanaugh, the mother of Brett Kavanaugh, was a Maryland district judge in 1996. She was the judge in a foreclosure case in which Christine Blasey Ford’s parents were the defendants. Martha Kavanaugh ruled against the parents of Christine Blasey Ford in the foreclosure case. Could there be residual resentment?

3) Ford's lawyer is a big Democrat donor who was involved in the Clinton / Paula Jones case.

4) Christine Blazey Ford is a far left professor and an open-borders activist who has signed anti-Trump immigration letters.

5) She also deleted her social media accounts just before coming forward. I don't blame her for that, but what would her posts reveal?

6) An "online professor rating site" has numerous reviews by from her students. Some say that they think she's crazy, and they were actually scared by her behavior.

All factors considered, I suspect that this is just last minute "hail mary pass" by the Democrats in a desperate attempt to block or delay President Trump from appointing another conservative justice to the Supreme Court.

First Bork, then Thomas and now Kavanaugh. Democrat tactics remain the same and are predictable.

Let her testify UNDER OATH on Monday. With the possible penalty of perjury in the balance, my guess is she or her lawyers will come up with a reason why she can not appear.

[rosco]

Ask President Hillary Clinton about counting chickens.....

B/B

Remember the media hoping that this would be Hillary's opponent?

 

You wouldn’t be embarrassed much with that representing you abroad!

[Contrarian]

Ask President Hillary Clinton about counting chickens.....

B/B

Remember the media hoping that this would be Hillary's opponent?

 

You wouldn’t be embarrassed much with that representing you abroad!

Hideous. 

[Contrarian]

President Bill Clinton won 43% of the popular vote and still was elected President in 1992. Bill Clinton won less than 50% of the popular vote in 1996 and won again. MOST people in America were disappointed their man wasn't elected but Democrats were happy with the method of voting back then. Only when they lose do they complain.

Touche'

'Interesting that Shakey asks me to 'read' what BillyB says and 'validates' his post above, but

1/ no-one has spotted the flaw in the origin of the electoral college system's inception - or even asked about it

2/ Clinton won with the highest vote of any candidate in elections with multiple  candidates ... yes ?   Unlike 'Trampu' who 'won' with THREE MILLION less individual votes...NUTs

Clinton and the DNC committed a crime against our election system by cheating Bernie Sanders out of the nomination to represent the Democrats in the 2016 election.

If you want to whine about something whine about that.

The reality is you’ve already shown yourself to be an immoral man by constantly working against the will of the UK people in regards to Brexit.

Don’t worry about how elections work in USA until you stop behaving like a spoiled brat and sore loser in the UK. 

[shakespear]

As I predicted, Professor Ford will not show up on Monday to testify under oath. 

I really value your opinion on this subject. Demanding an FBI investigation be
completed before she is willing to testify does appear to me to be politically motivated.
As a betting man, I think the odds are she and her attorney have looked at the fame
and financial success Anita Hill had AFTER her failed attempt to keep Justice Thomas
off the court and they're lining themselves up for the same piece of the pie that a
martyred and wronged by the "system" woman can now command in the current
"Me Too" environment.

[andrewfi]

Seems to me that her lawyer would know that the alleged incident was not a federal crime and thus not an FBI matter. Thus the call for an FBI investigation was a signal that there was nothing to investigate while still signalling to the sheeple that Kavanaugh was a rapist.

Her unwillingness to appear under oath suggests that she knows that nothing good can come of doing so for her personally. Of course, she is still of use in the court of popular opinion so there's going to be a lot said on the entertainment/news media with a view to influencing legislators to turn against Kavanaugh.

If the US is very lucky there might be a turning point in the way that such stories are handled by politicians, but I doubt it. Perhaps such stories designed as weapons against men and women might become less effective in the future. On the downside, honest, truthful, women might be put off making genuine claims as a result of this farrago.

[Contrarian]

As I predicted, Professor Ford will not show up on Monday to testify under oath. 

I really value your opinion on this subject. Demanding an FBI investigation be
completed before she is willing to testify does appear to me to be politically motivated.
As a betting man, I think the odds are she and her attorney have looked at the fame
and financial success Anita Hill had AFTER her failed attempt to keep Justice Thomas
off the court and they're lining themselves up for the same piece of the pie that a
martyred and wronged by the "system" woman can now command in the current
"Me Too" environment.

Why did she wait for 36 years to make this allegation? The entire thing is yet another bogus attempt by Democrats to derail a highly qualified candidate merely for political reasons. The “Democrats” are a pack of rabid lunatics and they showed their true colors at the start of this process.

This article at Fox references Anita Hill.

Quote
“Ford’s story is murkier and less documented than Hill’s was.

According to Ford, she never told anyone about the alleged drunken attempt at rape for 30 years, until a couples therapy session. Her therapist’s notes do not mention Kavanaugh’s name.

There is no pattern of abusive conduct whatsoever in Kavanaugh’s background. His denial of Ford’s accusations is clear and unequivocal.

“I have never done anything like what the accuser describes – to her or to anyone,” Kavanaugh said in a statement Monday. “Because this never happened, I had no idea who was making this accusation until she identified herself yesterday.”

Obviously, Ford’s accusation should be taken seriously. But we can’t ignore that her memory about the alleged incident is very vague. Ford said she thinks it happened back in 1982, but isn’t sure. She doesn’t know who owned the house where the party took place, how she got there, or how she got home.”


https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/09/18/john-fund-kavanaugh-and-ford-controversy-its-1991-all-over-again-and-even-some-honest-liberals-are-upset.amp.html

[AvHdB]

As I predicted, Professor Ford will not show up on Monday to testify under oath. 

I really value your opinion on this subject. Demanding an FBI investigation be
completed before she is willing to testify does appear to me to be politically motivated.
As a betting man, I think the odds are she and her attorney have looked at the fame
and financial success Anita Hill had AFTER her failed attempt to keep Justice Thomas
off the court and they're lining themselves up for the same piece of the pie that a
martyred and wronged by the "system" woman can now command in the current
"Me Too" environment.

Why did she wait for 36 years to make this allegation? The entire thing is yet another bogus attempt by Democrats to derail a highly qualified candidate merely for political reasons. The “Democrats” are a pack of rabid lunatics and they showed their true colors at the start of this process.

This article at Fox references Anita Hill.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/09/18/john-fund-kavanaugh-and-ford-controversy-its-1991-all-over-again-and-even-some-honest-liberals-are-upset.amp.html

Yes, I concur.

My guess the Democrats have done them selves a serious disservice and might help energize the Republicans to vote in November. I can be wrong but I doubt the Democrats are going to win what they hope. It was on a clever play by Feinstein but she picked a candidate (victim) that is weak.

[Contrarian]

As I predicted, Professor Ford will not show up on Monday to testify under oath. 

I really value your opinion on this subject. Demanding an FBI investigation be
completed before she is willing to testify does appear to me to be politically motivated.
As a betting man, I think the odds are she and her attorney have looked at the fame
and financial success Anita Hill had AFTER her failed attempt to keep Justice Thomas
off the court and they're lining themselves up for the same piece of the pie that a
martyred and wronged by the "system" woman can now command in the current
"Me Too" environment.

Why did she wait for 36 years to make this allegation? The entire thing is yet another bogus attempt by Democrats to derail a highly qualified candidate merely for political reasons. The “Democrats” are a pack of rabid lunatics and they showed their true colors at the start of this process.

This article at Fox references Anita Hill.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/09/18/john-fund-kavanaugh-and-ford-controversy-its-1991-all-over-again-and-even-some-honest-liberals-are-upset.amp.html

Yes, I concur.

My guess the Democrats have done them selves a serious disservice and might help energize the Republicans to vote in November. I can be wrong but I doubt the Democrats are going to win what they hope. It was on a clever play by Feinstein but she picked a candidate (victim) that is weak.

I edited my post above right after you responded.

Here’s more from my link above.

Then there is the way Ford brought her accusation forward. She didn’t contact the Judiciary Committee, instead writing to a Democratic lawmaker. She didn’t send her account to the FBI for investigation.

Ford instead allowed Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to sit on her charges throughout a lengthy confirmation hearing and Kavanaugh’s answering of 1,238 written questions – during which time no one brought up Ford’s letter.

Ford is insisting that she wanted to remain anonymous after she wrote her letter to the highly partisan Feinstein, currently running for re-election.

But at the same time, Ford hired a lawyer, Debra Katz, who is a Democratic activist and spoke in public defense of President Bill Clinton when he was accused of sexual misconduct by Paula Jones.


Bill Clinton the sleazy serial sexual harasser and rapist (allegedly) and Brett Kavanaugh mentioned in the same article? Absurd but par for the course for this partisan circus.

Congress needs to make a firm rule whereby any accuser must make statements to the Police within 1 year or forever remain silent. Anything other than that is an outrageous waste of valuable time and only benefits an uneducated mob mentality.

[Contrarian]

Even the left-wing San Francisco Chronicle is not happy with how this situation was handled by Dianne Feinstein.


Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s treatment of a more than 3-decade-old sexual assault allegation against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh was unfair all around. It was unfair to Kavanaugh, unfair to his accuser and unfair to Feinstein’s colleagues — Democrats and Republicans alike — on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Feinstein, a California Democrat, took the worst possible course by waiting until almost a week after Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing was completed to ominously announce that she had turned over “information from an individual” about Kavanaugh to the FBI,...


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/amp/Editorial-A-disturbing-11th-hour-allegation-13230890.php

[Contrarian]

Seems to me that her lawyer would know that the alleged incident was not a federal crime and thus not an FBI matter. Thus the call for an FBI investigation was a signal that there was nothing to investigate while still signalling to the sheeple that Kavanaugh was a rapist.

Her unwillingness to appear under oath suggests that she knows that nothing good can come of doing so for her personally. Of course, she is still of use in the court of popular opinion so there's going to be a lot said on the entertainment/news media with a view to influencing legislators to turn against Kavanaugh.

If the US is very lucky there might be a turning point in the way that such stories are handled by politicians, but I doubt it. Perhaps such stories designed as weapons against men and women might become less effective in the future. On the downside, honest, truthful, women might be put off making genuine claims as a result of this farrago.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nationalreview.com/2018/09/dianne-feinstein-brett-kavanaugh-accusation-confirmation-hearings/amp/

[Contrarian]

Is President Trump turning the corner and becoming more Presidential?  Let's all hope so although I don't want to jinx this by writing that, let's just send positive energy his way and hopefully he'll realize you catch more flies with honey. 


WASHINGTON -- White House aides who steeled themselves for what President Donald Trump would say when he finally addressed the sexual assault allegation against his Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh were quietly stunned when Trump said the process should be followed and the accuser should be heard.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/aides-quietly-stunned-by-trumps-respectful-handling-of-kavanaugh-accuser/ar-AAAoxVl?li=BBnb7Kz

[Contrarian]

It’s the economy, silly! 


Dow, S&P Surge to Record Closes as Economy Steams Ahead
-The Washington Post
“U.S. stock markets smashed records Thursday,” Thomas Heath reports, as investors “tuned out politics” and focused on “a flourishing economy.” Both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones industrial average closed at record highs. “It’s the S&P’s 19th record close this year and its 89th since the 2016 elections. The Dow recorded its 12th closing high of the year and its 100th new high since the presidential election.”

source: Washington Post

[Lord of the Dance]

It’s the economy, silly! 


Dow, S&P Surge to Record Closes as Economy Steams Ahead
-The Washington Post
“U.S. stock markets smashed records Thursday,” Thomas Heath reports, as investors “tuned out politics” and focused on “a flourishing economy.” Both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones industrial average closed at record highs. “It’s the S&P’s 19th record close this year and its 89th since the 2016 elections. The Dow recorded its 12th closing high of the year and its 100th new high since the presidential election.”

source: Washington Post

[2tallbill]

Let me make sure I've got Ms Fords story straight.

She has a fuzzy memory of attending a drunken party of hormone raging
teenagers that had zero adult supervision while wearing a bikini after dark
and she got felt up a bit. When she refused to let them go further they left.
She sustained no physical injuries and never told anybody about it.

Now 35 years later having become a liberal wacko nut job she get's to use
that fuzzy recollection to wreck somebody's life. I think not.

[Edit to add]
Oh, and she gets to hold up the Senate and the Supreme court because she
didn't feel like testifying when or the way they wanted.

[Contrarian]

It’s the economy, silly! 


Dow, S&P Surge to Record Closes as Economy Steams Ahead
-The Washington Post
“U.S. stock markets smashed records Thursday,” Thomas Heath reports, as investors “tuned out politics” and focused on “a flourishing economy.” Both the S&P 500 and Dow Jones industrial average closed at record highs. “It’s the S&P’s 19th record close this year and its 89th since the 2016 elections. The Dow recorded its 12th closing high of the year and its 100th new high since the presidential election.”

source: Washington Post

https://amp.businessinsider.com/mark-cuba-no-doubt-in-my-mind-market-crashes-if-trump-wins-2016-9

                           

[Contrarian]

Let me make sure I've got Ms Fords story straight.

She has a fuzzy memory of attending a drunken party of hormone raging
teenagers that had zero adult supervision while wearing a bikini after dark
and she got felt up a bit. When she refused to let them go further they left.
She sustained no physical injuries and never told anybody about it.

Now 35 years later having become a liberal wacko nut job she get's to use
that fuzzy recollection to wreck somebody's life. I think not.

[Edit to add]
Oh, and she gets to hold up the Senate and the Supreme court because she
didn't feel like testifying when or the way they wanted.

Feinstein sat on the bogus allegation since July; she should be banned from Congress for such an obvious partisan dirty trick.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/what-democrats-have-become-1537397973

[2tallbill]

Feinstein sat on the bogus allegation since July; she should be banned from Congress for such an obvious partisan dirty trick.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/what-democrats-have-become-1537397973

The people of California are going to elect an 85 year old war horse
(ready for the glue factory) to the Senate for another 6 year term.
Her and John McCain are the poster child's for term limits.

Is it her goal in life to die in office too?

[AvHdB]

Let me make sure I've got Ms Fords story straight.

She has a fuzzy memory of attending a drunken party of hormone raging
teenagers that had zero adult supervision while wearing a bikini after dark
and she got felt up a bit. When she refused to let them go further they left.
She sustained no physical injuries and never told anybody about it.

Now 35 years later having become a liberal wacko nut job she get's to use
that fuzzy recollection to wreck somebody's life. I think not.

[Edit to add]
Oh, and she gets to hold up the Senate and the Supreme court because she
didn't feel like testifying when or the way they wanted.

I believe she stated she was wearing a one piece bathing suit.

[andrewfi]

Apparently, Mrs Ford was alone at whatever event she is claiming to remember. Of the five people she claims were present, none, apart from the story teller, have any recall of the event, or their presence at it. Even her best friend who was supposedly there has said that she wasn't.

If I knew no better, and maybe I don't, I'd be asking if Mrs Ford had undergone hypnotherapy at about the time she came up with the precursor claims made in a relationship therapy session with her husband. Sounds like a manufactured memory to me.

One other thought having had a relationship with a woman who had a personality disorder that led to her manufacturing reality from bits and pieces of real memories, I'd have some sympathy with Mrs Ford if such was found to be the case with her. In such cases a sufferer honestly believes their memories, as do most of us. For her the manufactured events are real. When such people find their 'reality' conflicting with the shared reality of those around them, they undergo a lot of stress and seem to get very angry in supporting their faulty versions of reality. If that's the case here Mrs Ford is suffering hugely right now and those close to her who are supporting her claim and seeking to use her as a weapon to subvert the rule of law are guilty of a horrendous abuse of the woman.

[AvHdB]

. . . Mrs Ford is suffering hugely right now and those close to her who are supporting her claim and seeking to use her as a weapon to subvert the rule of law are guilty of a horrendous abuse of the woman.

Andrew in a roundabout way nails it. The greater problem is two fold; women who have been abused are neglected and the course of democracy is subverted.

With regards to Mrs. Ford she is little more than a pawn.

[Texan77]

This is what the real story should be. The attempt to have a coup and the shadow unelected government Trump has to deal with. 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/lindsey-graham-appoint-special-counsel-to-investigate-%e2%80%98bureaucratic-coup%e2%80%99-against-trump/ar-AAAwOWm?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=SK216DHP

[Wiz]

Finally this is how the CURRENT USA government
appears to the rest of the world today.

Another episode of ..... DALLAS !

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?




Enjoy its tune......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqa0Neu9Dxo

    

[andrewfi]

As was to be expected, another worm crawls out of the woodwork. Another case where the victim was unable to remember the event, this time admitting that she was pissed as a fart at the time. Again, others supposed to have witnessed the event have no recollection. I just read of a third potential 'event'.

Here's what's going to happen: Kavanaugh will not rise to the Supeme Court. From now on, all potential appointees, to this and other positions, will suffer the same kind of attacks and it will become much, much harder to find good quality candidates.

The rule of law is being dismantled in the United States.