President Trump

[Contrarian]

Just my opinion but I'll bet Trump and Putin were laughing and telling jokes about how this meeting would drive the MSM totally out of sorts.

The average joe doesn't rely on 'MSM' to figure out these are two SCARY guys with wacky concepts of what is 'right' - in charge of powerful nations

Exactly what is scary about President Trump wanting to close immigration loopholes in order to protect our sovereignty?

What was scary about Trump meeting with No. Korea’s Kim on behalf of World peace?

Name one thing scary about Trump other than his hair. 

No doubt you preferred the Hilda beast.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.


https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

[2tallbill]

I think they're more excited about the newly discovered tapes, now
in the possession of the FBI that Cohen made of private conversations
he had with President Trump.

Private tapes between a client and his attorney? I doubt it.
Cohen would be disbarred in a New York minute if he made
them without his clients knowledge. Not even Hillary judge
Kimba the Mexican housekeeper Wood, would allow them
into evidence.

[andrewfi]

If this recording was legally significant it'd not have been publicised in this manner. The recording, which seems to exist and be genuine, was released to support the ongoing campaign against the president and is aimed at the hard of thinking and know-littles who are the usual targets of such actions. Proper thinkers, whatever they might think of the president as a person, know that this was simply a diversion from other, more important, matters.

[2tallbill]

If this recording was legally significant it'd not have been publicised in this manner. The recording, which seems to exist and be genuine, was released to support the ongoing campaign against the president and is aimed at the hard of thinking and know-littles who are the usual targets of such actions. Proper thinkers, whatever they might think of the president as a person, know that this was simply a diversion from other, more important, matters.

Yes, I agree. The odds that some deep throat type incriminating tape
exists and some cub reporter found it and is going to publish it only
happens in Hollywood.

If the FBI seized a bunch of tapes from a lawyer and then told everyone
that they would protect lawyer/client privilege and then release them
to the press would jeopardize their case and their careers and might
make the judge throw the whole thing out.

[B.B.]

The liberal media and the democrats are all wound up over President Trumps invite to President Putin to visit the white house later this year.  They're now demanding to know what was said during the presidents one one meeting.
Should President Trump have to reveal what was discussed behind closed doors?

I think they're more excited about the newly discovered tapes, now
in the possession of the FBI that Cohen made of private conversations
he had with President Trump.   

If there was anything incriminating with the tape,  this would have been made public much differently.
There's nothing illegal,  it's just another feeble attempt at defaming President Trump.

^ This.

This absolutely lends credence to President Trump's complaint that there's a Deep State (which there is) and that it is out to get him (which it is).

B/B

[msmoby]

IF the 'deep state' is out to get 'Trampu' - he'd have been impeached by now

Q: Can the lawyer record these conversations, legally - without informing the client - in NY state ?  YES ...

I'd record any conversation I had with Trampu given his 'inability to remember what he has written - let alone spoken.

[rosco]

IF the 'deep state' is out to get 'Trampu' - he'd have been impeached by now

Q: Can the lawyer record these conversations, legally - without informing the client - in NY state ?  YES ...

I'd record any conversation I had with Trampu given his 'inability to remember what he has written - let alone spoken.

It's a shame you didn't record your conversation with Jeremy Clarkson, that time you ripped him infront of all his mates at Anne Robinson's house.

You're such a legend Mob's. 

[Contrarian]

IF the 'deep state' is out to get 'Trampu' - he'd have been impeached by now.

The left says Trump is not their President. Therefore if he’s not their President they cannot impeach him. 

[Dogsoldier]

IF the 'deep state' is out to get 'Trampu' - he'd have been impeached by now.

The left says Trump is not their President. Therefore if he’s not their President they cannot impeach him. 

What’s the other catchphrase they use.....’not in my name’, right!  F*****g dimwits.

[2tallbill]

IF the 'deep state' is out to get 'Trampu' - he'd have been impeached by now

The deep state are the non-elected bureaucrats that last through
administration after administration that have lots of power, however
little of it is constitutionally mandated. Impeachment is a constitutionally
defined process that elected members of the House of representatives can
start.

[Contrarian]

IF the 'deep state' is out to get 'Trampu' - he'd have been impeached by now

The deep state are the non-elected bureaucrats that last through
administration after administration that have lots of power, however
little of it is constitutionally mandated. Impeachment is a constitutionally
defined process that elected members of the House of representatives can
start.

I think you're wasting your time. He also doesn't comprehend that we are a Republic
and we elect Presidents based on electoral votes and not the popular vote.

Thank providence for that because otherwise it would be rule of the mob and civil war would ensue.

[Tom Cat]

President Trump is making good on his promise to make America great again!


https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2018/07/23/bill-maher-recession-us-economy-china-growth-rate-2q18-barclays-capital/

[Contrarian]

President Trump is making good on his promise to make America great again!


https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2018/07/23/bill-maher-recession-us-economy-china-growth-rate-2q18-barclays-capital/

Trumps tax cuts and regulatory rollbacks have worked magic on the US economy.

Don’t worry secret-socialist Moby will be along shortly to claim tax cuts don’t work.

But then there’s this. 

Within the eurozone, only Ireland comes close with its 4.2% forecasted growth rate in the second. Ireland has been using low taxes to lure in U.S. tech companies.

[msmoby]

The deep state are the non-elected bureaucrats that last through
administration after administration that have lots of power, however
little of it is constitutionally mandated. Impeachment is a constitutionally
defined process that elected members of the House of representatives can
start.

Thanks, Beel - had to look it up:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment


"Because impeachment and conviction of officials involve an overturning of the normal constitutional procedures by which individuals achieve high office (election, ratification, or appointment) and because it generally requires a supermajority, they are usually reserved for those deemed to have committed serious abuses of their office"

[Tom Cat]

The walk away movement could really hurt the democrats come November,  and beyond
There's quite a few videos about the movement with some having half million views or more .

[Tom Cat]

.Will Mexico pay for the wall?

.

[Contrarian]

.Will Mexico pay for the wall?

.

No.

[Slumba]

.Will Mexico pay for the wall?

.

If they tax remittances to Mexico and other Central and South American countries, yes. 

[Contrarian]

.Will Mexico pay for the wall?

.

If they tax remittances to Mexico and other Central and South American countries, yes.

I’ll believe it when I see it. 

[B.B.]

.Will Mexico pay for the wall?

.

If they tax remittances to Mexico and other Central and South American countries, yes.

I’ll believe it when I see it. 

Actually, that would be a fairly easy thing to do - impose the tax on Western Union, MoneyGram, etc. 

The Mexicans would have to find a way around it, which could be set up the way the Arabs do it, i.e. "My cousin Achmed will give your grandfather $100 in Jordan, in exchange for you giving me $110 in the USA" or whatever.

[Slumba]

.Will Mexico pay for the wall?

.

If they tax remittances to Mexico and other Central and South American countries, yes.

I’ll believe it when I see it. 

Actually, that would be a fairly easy thing to do - impose the tax on Western Union, MoneyGram, etc. 

The Mexicans would have to find a way around it, which could be set up the way the Arabs do it, i.e. "My cousin Achmed will give your grandfather $100 in Jordan, in exchange for you giving me $110 in the USA" or whatever.

Money transmission businesses are highly regulated, as well. California requires a $25 million bond to be posted to start one.  They would have no choice but to comply.   

[Wiz]

Colorado capitol prankster places Putin portrait
where Trump's should be

An unidentified prankster struck the Colorado state capitol this week, placing a portrait of Vladimir Putin in a space intended for a picture of Donald Trump.

 

[2tallbill]

The Mexicans would have to find a way around it, which could be set up the way the Arabs do it, i.e. "My cousin Achmed will give your grandfather $100 in Jordan, in exchange for you giving me $110 in the USA" or whatever.

I lived in California before they had money gram. They would buy
money orders and put them in the mail.

[Tom Cat]

The liberal media condemned President Trump for not believing the intelligence agencies about Russia. Then we have  George Bush having every agency verifying Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.  Given how this turned out for Bush, I  would think President Trump has good reason to doubt the intelligence agencies.

[Contrarian]

The liberal media condemned President Trump for not believing the intelligence agencies about Russia. Then we have  George Bush having every agency verifying Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.  Given how this turned out for Bush, I  would think President Trump has good reason to doubt the intelligence agencies.

That’s a very good point of course but more recent information about the CIA which was released by Wiki about Vault 7 is that the CIA could hack the DNC but make it look like Russia did it.   

Also recently it seems that alleged chemical weapons attacks by Syria on their own citizens may have been false flag operations.